<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be Careful With the Word Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/</link>
	<description>Blogging Tips to help you blog better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Boyle</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-14548</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-14548</guid>
		<description>Personally I think the whole &quot;spam&quot; thing has gotton out of control. We see spammers get more jail time and harsher fines than people who commit assualt!! Lets be honest, if someone rings you out of the blue it&#039;s alot more intrusive than pressing delete on your keyboard. I really think the law especially in the U.S has gotton out of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think the whole &#8220;spam&#8221; thing has gotton out of control. We see spammers get more jail time and harsher fines than people who commit assualt!! Lets be honest, if someone rings you out of the blue it&#8217;s alot more intrusive than pressing delete on your keyboard. I really think the law especially in the U.S has gotton out of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-796</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - advertising and the revenue it can produce adds to the sustainable nature of great content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; advertising and the revenue it can produce adds to the sustainable nature of great content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-792</guid>
		<description>It appears that some people on the net are opposed to any advertising. As you so aptly expressed, just ignore advertising if it offends you. If advertising didn&#039;t work and wasn&#039;t profitable, then it would not exist. 

Regardless of its effectiveness, advertising is not spam. Spam, to me, is uninvited, unwanted intrusion into my experience. If I click on a link to visit a website, and have to view and ad in addition to the content I really want to read or see, I have invited those advertisements.

Viewing ads is, in my view, the admission ticket to accessing the collective knowledge of the world and, of course, some bs also.

These folks who want to internet to be &quot;pure&quot; should examine their heads. Anything worth having is worth paying for. The cost of looking at or ignoring an ad is almost negligible. And it is certainly not spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that some people on the net are opposed to any advertising. As you so aptly expressed, just ignore advertising if it offends you. If advertising didn&#8217;t work and wasn&#8217;t profitable, then it would not exist. </p>
<p>Regardless of its effectiveness, advertising is not spam. Spam, to me, is uninvited, unwanted intrusion into my experience. If I click on a link to visit a website, and have to view and ad in addition to the content I really want to read or see, I have invited those advertisements.</p>
<p>Viewing ads is, in my view, the admission ticket to accessing the collective knowledge of the world and, of course, some bs also.</p>
<p>These folks who want to internet to be &#8220;pure&#8221; should examine their heads. Anything worth having is worth paying for. The cost of looking at or ignoring an ad is almost negligible. And it is certainly not spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Smash</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Smash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-786</guid>
		<description>[...] Be Careful with the Word Spam &#8211; We Blog Better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Be Careful with the Word Spam &#8211; We Blog Better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Harmon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-743</guid>
		<description>I think I just threw up a little thinking about the aroma of spam wafting through the house.  

I probably need to learn to respond to comments in smaller groups so I don&#039;t fill up people&#039;s feeds with 15 comments.  I&#039;m also thinking about turning off the tweet feature, but I&#039;ve done that a few times and it seems to turn itself back on.  Kinda creepy really, but not as much as seared spam.  ;)
.-= Brad Harmon´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/12/how-i-make-money-from-this-site-and-you/&quot;&gt;How I Make Money From This Site (and You)&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I just threw up a little thinking about the aroma of spam wafting through the house.  </p>
<p>I probably need to learn to respond to comments in smaller groups so I don&#8217;t fill up people&#8217;s feeds with 15 comments.  I&#8217;m also thinking about turning off the tweet feature, but I&#8217;ve done that a few times and it seems to turn itself back on.  Kinda creepy really, but not as much as seared spam.  ;)<br />
.-= Brad Harmon´s last blog ..<a href="http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/12/how-i-make-money-from-this-site-and-you/">How I Make Money From This Site (and You)</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-741</guid>
		<description>My opinion is that tweeting your comments is not spam. However, I used to do the same and finally came to the conclusion that a comment must have a context, so on Twitter some comments look out of place. But definitely not spam in my book.

And... you should tried it seared in some olive oil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is that tweeting your comments is not spam. However, I used to do the same and finally came to the conclusion that a comment must have a context, so on Twitter some comments look out of place. But definitely not spam in my book.</p>
<p>And&#8230; you should tried it seared in some olive oil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Harmon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Brandon,

Okay, my new pet peeve is bloggers who spam pictures of spam. ;)  Seriously though, my stomach is churning looking at all that spam.  

I&#039;ve noticed that I&#039;ve been tweeting a ton of my comment lately - I keep forgetting that option is turned on.  I wonder if people think of that as spam.  What&#039;s your opinion?

Brad
.-= Brad Harmon´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/12/how-i-make-money-from-this-site-and-you/&quot;&gt;How I Make Money From This Site (and You)&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon,</p>
<p>Okay, my new pet peeve is bloggers who spam pictures of spam. ;)  Seriously though, my stomach is churning looking at all that spam.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that I&#8217;ve been tweeting a ton of my comment lately &#8211; I keep forgetting that option is turned on.  I wonder if people think of that as spam.  What&#8217;s your opinion?</p>
<p>Brad<br />
.-= Brad Harmon´s last blog ..<a href="http://bradleyaharmon.com/2009/12/how-i-make-money-from-this-site-and-you/">How I Make Money From This Site (and You)</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-703</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. I almost never send a DM for any reason unless I&#039;m truly engaging in a conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. I almost never send a DM for any reason unless I&#8217;m truly engaging in a conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Lately, my definition of &quot;spam&quot; is mainly attributed to Twitter and the spammers that send DM&#039;s that try to hack your account so they can send DM&#039;s to everyone you follow. The rest of it (you listed) is tolerable even if I don&#039;t always agree. (and I try to click on an ad or two when visiting a site that puts obvious hard work into providing valuable info!)
.-= Keith @ Superior Fence Products´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://buy-fence.com/vinyl/vinyl-privacy-fence-products/&quot;&gt;Vinyl Privacy Fence Products&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, my definition of &#8220;spam&#8221; is mainly attributed to Twitter and the spammers that send DM&#8217;s that try to hack your account so they can send DM&#8217;s to everyone you follow. The rest of it (you listed) is tolerable even if I don&#8217;t always agree. (and I try to click on an ad or two when visiting a site that puts obvious hard work into providing valuable info!)<br />
.-= Keith @ Superior Fence Products´s last blog ..<a href="http://buy-fence.com/vinyl/vinyl-privacy-fence-products/">Vinyl Privacy Fence Products</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-658</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Samuel</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>John Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-653</guid>
		<description>Quite interesting to see a different view of spam in this post. I would like to add one more context to the word spam, whenever you are busy, any forwarded message look like a spam. But the same mail if it comes on a day when you are not too obsessed with the work, we pay a lot of attention to it
.-= John Samuel ´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/johnsamuel/cIrW/~3/NXFwz3Gjpw4/&quot;&gt;Twitter lists: Public or private?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting to see a different view of spam in this post. I would like to add one more context to the word spam, whenever you are busy, any forwarded message look like a spam. But the same mail if it comes on a day when you are not too obsessed with the work, we pay a lot of attention to it<br />
.-= John Samuel ´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/johnsamuel/cIrW/~3/NXFwz3Gjpw4/">Twitter lists: Public or private?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://weblogbetter.com/2009/12/01/be-careful-with-the-word-spam/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogbetter.com/?p=331#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Very true, and we all have a slightly personalized definition of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, and we all have a slightly personalized definition of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: weblogbetter.com @ 2012-02-09 14:06:42 -->
